Meanwhile, I have created a SAN 2.0 VPS with Centos 5.5, PHP 5.3.3, Nginx 0.8.50, MySQL 5.0.91, APC 3.1.3p1, Memcache 2.2.5, WordPress 3.01 installed. With W3 Total Cache, it's reasonably fast but uses at least 200MB.
Quote:This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Concurrency Level: 1000
Time taken for tests: 1.346 seconds
Complete requests: 10000
Failed requests: 8
(Connect: 0, Receive: 0, Length: 8, Exceptions: 0)
Write errors: 0
Non-2xx responses: 10062
Total transferred: 38969287 bytes
HTML transferred: 37297195 bytes
Requests per second: 7428.25 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 134.621 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.135 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 28268.91 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 4 5.8 2 45
Processing: 2 15 25.9 13 1246
Waiting: 0 10 25.8 8 1244
Total: 5 18 27.7 14 1283
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 14
66% 16
75% 21
80% 23
90% 27
95% 33
98% 53
99% 64
100% 1283 (longest request)
I will create another SAN 2.0 VPS using the lowendscript by lowendbox.com and compare the performance.
Needless to said, my new site is freeonlinegames88.com which will be used to test ArcadeBB V4 Theme and Trade Plugin.
iBannerX.com Arcade Banner Click Exchange Sign up now and get 80,000 free credits!!! http://ibannerx.com
Posts: 182
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 0 Points: 233
RE: Apache vs Nginx
Different software can give significant difference in mem usage etc, specialy when your site gets bigger and bigger.
But.. Wordpress is a big CPU/MEM user, if you would compare it with a php scripted site i wonder how big that diffenrece is, on my shared hosting i was making the servers flip over with my wordpress site. After the plugins w3 total cache no problems but still WP consumes alot.
I'm not spec as admin, but my admins setup Nginx on front-end for static content and Apache on back-end. My WP arcade loading pages very fast on shared host. Also all CJ's running with this method - Nginx for thumbs and Apache on back-end. So, server and scripts (streamrotator + scj) working more productive.
ArcadeBB, do you testing V4 with geo trading? And I want to ask, why W3 Total Cache? Many admins says that Super Cache is more fast
Posts: 683
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 0 Points: 1096
RE: Apache vs Nginx
4ks,
I will be starting on geo trading soon. I didn't really compare W3 Total Cache Vs WP Super Cache but I guess I used W3 Total Cache as it has more features.
iBannerX.com Arcade Banner Click Exchange Sign up now and get 80,000 free credits!!! http://ibannerx.com